Invalidating an election

Well into the latter part of 2017, social media users continued to circulate an image touting a petition seeking to overturn the results of the 2016 U. presidential election due to purported Russian interference, even though the information it referenced was long outdated. Our Supreme Court set the case for Conference on Friday, March 17th to put the petition in front of all of the Justices. There has never before been a case about the Constitution’s Guarantee Clause (which obliges the federal government to protect states from foreign invaders) like this decided in front of the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court to nullify the presidential 2016 election was covered in an Occupy Democrats article of 23 February 2017: A longshot legal petition to nullify the 2016 federal elections based on the Constitution’s “Guarantee Clause” just moved forward at the Supreme Court this week, after last week the Trump administration declined to reply. Additionally, the three Massachusetts women who petitioned the court have asked for the appointment of a Special Master, which is a special officer to weigh the evidence and make findings to the Court.

We contacted Counsel Press for further clarification and spoke to Liebman, who reiterated that under 20 percent of distributed petitions even rated discussion during the conferences.

Liebman added that the Chief Justice directed the Court to take note of cases they believed merited discussion, and the vast majority of distributed cases didn’t rate.

Those laws could also be considered the doctrines to answer your third question.

And yes, that includes the recount that was stopped by Bush v.

Those which aren’t discussed, become automatically denied.

In any event, “distributed for conference” is a somewhat misleading phrase.

[Vice President Mike Pence] can’t be president as he, too, was elected under this same fraud.” “The court has to rule either that the president is the winner of the popular vote OR the election must be held over,” he concluded.

“The Republicans — the beneficiaries of this treason — cannot be allowed to hold on to the power by default.

Search for invalidating an election:

invalidating an election-85invalidating an election-85

reporting that Donald Trump campaign aides had repeated contacts with Russian intelligence, liberal pundit Michael Moore called on the courts to rule the 2016 election invalid and declare the popular vote winner — Hillary Clinton — President of the United States.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “invalidating an election”

  1. If you're tired of being disappointed by sex sites that promise they will set you up on a casual encounter, and then once they have your membership fee, you never end up meeting any real members. Since this was our purpose to create Free in the first place.